![]() I have conducted research on the protection of corporate whistleblowers in South Africa compared to international jurisdictions, such as Australia. The low levels of reports of wrongdoing and the widespread victimisation of whistleblowers are proof of the weak protection South Africa offers corporate whistleblowers. ![]() The main reasons for this are a fear of being victimised and a fear of losing one’s job. Despite some protections given to whistleblowers, the reporting rates of wrongdoing are low. Given South Africa’s high levels of corporate corruption, whistleblowers deserve high levels of protection. Whistleblower protection in South Africa lags behind international standards and inadequately protects whistleblowers in some respects. This is why corporate whistleblowers whose positions give them an inside track on misconduct are so important in exposing corporate crime and corruption.īut whistleblowers risk personal and financial risk by coming out. This is because it is often hidden by a complicated web of transactions, misleading corporate records and convoluted company group structures. Corporate misconduct is difficult to detect and prove.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |